Press

I have never sought visibility as a goal.
Visibility, when it becomes an end, alters the gesture. It makes it more cautious, more accommodating, more concerned with pleasing than with saying something true. I work in the opposite way: I do, study, build, think. And then, every now and then, someone looks inside and asks to talk.

Interviews, podcasts, public speaking are not opportunities for personal exposure for me. They are moments of verification. A test of resilience. They serve to understand if what I do, what I think, what I build holds up even when extracted from its natural context and placed under a different light. The light is not always kind. And that's just as it should be.

When I agree to speak in public, it is not to recount a career, but to share a position. A mental posture. A way of being within technology, creativity, complex systems without being consumed by enthusiasm or fear. I speak when I think that the exchange can be useful. To me, even before to those who listen.

There is a widespread misunderstanding about the idea of “public appearance.” It is thought to be for convincing, promoting, simplifying. I use it for the opposite: to complicate well. To introduce doubts where there is easy certainty. To slow down where everything rushes. To remind that behind every system, every product, every algorithm, there are human decisions and therefore human responsibilities.

In these contexts, I do not bring ready-made answers. I bring well-formulated questions. I bring lived experiences, mistakes, successful attempts, and failed attempts. I bring a vision that is not born to please, but to function over time. If someone leaves reassured, good. If someone leaves unsettled, equally good. The important thing is that they leave less distracted.

My relationship with the media has always been one of measure. I do not accumulate appearances. I do not chase opportunities. I prefer few interventions, but situated. Places where dialogue is possible. Spaces where one can go deep without having to reduce everything to slogans. When this is not possible, I move on. Silence, often, is more honest.

This section is not a celebration. It is an archive. A trace left over time. Here you find moments when the work that normally remains behind the scenes has encountered an external voice: a question, an editorial team, an audience. Every voice collected here is a conversation, not a performance.

If there is a common poetics to these interventions, it is the same that guides everything else: the search for clarity without simplification, depth without emphasis, vision without propaganda. Speaking in public, for me, is an extension of work, not a narcissistic parenthesis. It is another way to test ideas, to put them to the test of listening.

Here you will find interviews, conversations, appearances. They are not ordered by importance, but by time. Because time is the only honest criterion. Ideas change, refine, sometimes contradict themselves. It is right that there is a trace of this too. Not for apparent coherence, but for fidelity to the journey.

If you have arrived here expecting a stage, you might be disappointed.
If you have arrived here to listen to an open dialogue, perhaps you will find something worth your time.

The rest is noise.